October 28, 2006: lies of propagandist Blocher
in his jubilee speech "20 Years AUNS": concealing
facts without end
1,500 "Blocher friends" were celebrating the jubilee and
were stuck in their prejudices and in their schemes of
judgment and prejudices as before and ever. In this speech
from 2006 which is probably written by Nazi propagandist
Mörgeli important facts and comparisons are left out again
and again without end.
Swiss newspaper "Virgin News" ("Jungfrauzeitung") is
reporting:
<After the official ceremony the AUNS members and their
friends began to develop their festivity properly with
speeches hold by President of AUNS Pirmin Schwander, of
the local President of Matten, Andres Grossniklaus, and of
Government Member Christoph Blocher. In a huge party tent
1,500 people were enjoying the festival after the official
part which had lasted 2 hours, with good meals with meat,
vegetables and mashed potatoes. And there was diversion
with singer Sarah Jane and with SVP poet Oskar Freysinger,
and there was much time for political discussions.>
(orig. in German:
<Richtig zum Feiern kamen die zahlreichen
AUNS-Mitglieder und Freunde schliesslich nach der
offiziellen Zeremonie mit Reden von AUNS-Präsident
Pirmin Schwander, Mattens Gemeindepräsident Andres
Grossniklaus und Bundesrat Christoph Blocher. In einem
riesigen Festzelt gab es für die 1500 Teilnehmer des
offiziellen Unterhaltungsteils nach der gut
zweistündigen offiziellen Feier einen hübsch
angerichteten Teller voll Fleisch, Gemüse und
Kartoffelstock, Unterhaltung mit der Sängerin Sarah Jane
und SVP-Dichter Oskar Freysinger und viel Zeit für
politische Diskussionen.>)
http://www.jungfrauzeitung.ch/artikel/70150/
Wonderful, But what was coming out? Let's see the speech
of Mr. Justice Minister Blocher "20 Years of AUNS" which
can be found in the Internet. It seems really a surprise
that Mr. Blocher is just repeating all his lies from 1992
and it seems he made NO intellectual progress at all. The
truth is just like this: EEA is NO EU, and an access to
EEA is NO an access to EU and two different people's votes
are needed. But Mr. Blocher is not making any difference
in his speech in 2006 and presents the claim that without
AUNS Switzerland had become a member of EU since a long
time already. Quotation (translation by Michael Palomino):
http://www.ejpd.admin.ch/content/ejpd/de/home/dokumentation/red/archiv/reden_christoph_blocher/2006/2006-10-28.html
| <Man kann die
Bedeutung und Mission der AUNS in einem Satz
zusammenfassen:
Ohne AUNS hätten wir unsere Unabhängigkeit
verloren. (Lüge! Der EWR hätte ebenso die
Unabhängigkeit garantiert).
Ohne AUNS wären wir heute Mitglied der
Europäischen Union. (Lüge! Für eine
EU-Mitgliedschaft hätte es eine eigene
Abstimmung gegeben, und die wurde ja
abgelehnt).
Ohne AUNS wäre das Schweizer Volk entmündigt
worden. (Lüge! Der EWR hätte die Schweiz
NICHT entmündigt).
Denn eine EU-Mitgliedschaft wäre auch das Ende
der direkten Demokratie und damit das Ende
unserer einzigartigen Volksrechte.(Lüge! Eine
EU-Mitgliedschaft hätte es NIE gegeben!)
Ohne AUNS hätte die Schweiz ihre Neutralität
aufgegeben. (Lüge! Die Neutralität kann im EWR
weiterbestehen!)
Jene aussenpolitische Maxime also, die unser
Land 150 Jahre lang erfolgreich vor allen
Kriegshandlungen bewahrt hat.(Lüge! Die
Neutralität war gar keine sondern eine volle
Kollaboration mit dem Nazi-Reich bis nach
1945, und die Schweiz wurde NIE
entnazifiziert).
Darum gilt es festzuhalten:
Die AUNS ist der Stosstrupp der Unabhängigkeit.
(Lüge! Der EWR garantiert auch die politische
Unabhängigkeit).
Die AUNS ist die Verteidigerin der direkten
Demokratie. (Lüge! Genau die Nazi-SVP
manipuliert die Demokratie mit ihren
rassistischen Inseraten und Plakaten und streut
dauernd Angst und bewirkt so falsche Mehrheiten,
ohne dass sich wirklich etwas ändert).
Die AUNS ist das Bollwerk der Neutralität.>
(Lüge! Die Schweiz ist das Bollwerk des
Bankgeheimnisses für alle kriminellen Diktatoren
und ist der Geldwäscher für das Internationale
Verbrechen mit der UBS AG, vor allem in der
Basler Abteilung, die früher Bankverein hiess).
Herr Blocher beschwört eine Schweiz ohne EWR:
<Die Schweiz hat ohne EWR überlebt. Gerade
deswegen sogar sehr gut überlebt! Die Schweiz
konnte ihren Wohlstand gerade ausserhalb vom EWR
– und nicht zuletzt deswegen – behaupten.> |
|
|
<One can
really make a summary in just one sentence about
the significance and the mission of AUNS:
Without AUNS we had lost our independence. (Lie!
EEA had bewared independence!)
Without AUNS we were member of European Union
now. (Lie! For a membership in the EU an own
people's vote had been necessary, and this had
been rejected).
Without AUNS Swiss population had been placed
under disability. (Lie! EEA had never put Swiss
population under disability).
Because a EU membership would have been the end
of direct democracy and would be the end of our
special people's rights. (Lie! EU membership had
never been!)
Without AUNS Switzerland had given up it's
neutrality. (Lie! Neutrality can be also within
EEA).
This is the guideline which was a pure success
in the last 150 years bewaring our country from
any war action. (Lie! Neutrality was no
neutrality but was a full collaboration with the
Nazi Empire up to 1945 and even after 1945, and
Switzerland was never denazified).
That's why we have to state:
This AUNS is a combat patrol for independence.
(Lie! EEA is also a guarantee of political
independence).
This AUNS is the defense of direct democracy.
(Lie! Just this Nazi SVP is manipulating
democracy with racist and discriminating
advertisings and posters spreading fear
everywhere provoking wrong majorities, and
nothing is really changing).
This AUNS is the fortress for neutrality.>
(Lie! Switzerland is a fortress for the bank
secret for any criminal dictator and for the
money launderer of International Crime in the
high street bank of UBS AG, above all in the
Basel section which was called "Bankverein"
before).
And then Blocher is invoking Switzerland without
EEA:
<Switzerland has survived without EEA. Just
because of this Switzerland survived very well.
Switzerland could confirm it's wealth outside of
EEA - and not only because of this.>
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Blocher can claim this, but all the work was done by
others, and the reproach of being a cherry picker other
had to accept. Switzerland has the most little offices in
Brussels or in certain positions there is no office at
all. This is the will of this propagandist Blocher. He put
Switzerland in Brussels at the last place. Liechtenstein,
Norway, and Island are going very well with EEA and are
not at the last place...
Herr Blocher
beschwört eine effiziente Schweiz ohne EWR. Da
sei eine Studie des WEF:
<Vor circa zwei Monaten ist eine
Zeitungsmeldung erschienen, die es in sich
hatte. Das World Economic Forum (WEF) hat die
Ergebnisse einer breit angelegten Studie
veröffentlicht. Es wurde weltweit die
Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Industrieländer
untersucht. Und siehe da: Die Schweiz belegte
den ersten Rang. >
Nun, diese Effizienz in der Schweiz ist auch mit
EWR möglich, ohne in Brüssel an letzter Stelle
zu stehen. Aber das unterschlägt Herr Blocher.
Und weiter sagte Herr Blocher, da sei eine
Untersuchung des Weltwirtschaftsforums (das
World Economic Forum, das sich einmal jährlich
in Davos trifft, kurz WEF):
<Die WEF-Untersuchung zeigte, dass die
Schweiz über besondere Qualitäten verfügt: einen
robusten Finanzplatz, eine hervorragende
Forschung, politische Stabilität,
vergleichsweise tiefe Steuern und gute
Infrastrukturen.> |
|
|
Mr. Blocher
invokes an efficient Switzerland without EEA.
There is a study by World Economic Forum (WEF):
<Just about two months ago there was a report
in a newspaper showing striking details. World
Economic Forum (WEF) had published the results
of a broad investigating study. Efficiency of
the industrial countries was investigated. And
Switzerland was Number 1.>
Well, this efficiency is also possible when
Switzerland is in EEA, without being at the last
place in Brussels. But this is concealed by Mr.
Blocher.
Further on Mr. Blocher is presenting more
details about this study:
<The investigation of WEF is showing that
Switzerland has special qualities: a tough
financial center, very well developed science
sector, political stability, low taxes, good
infrastructure.>
|
|
|
|
|
Well, what means a "tough financial center"? These
innocent words contain just the criminal bank secret that
is used by all governments of the world concealing their
funds under the cover of the bank secret in Switzerland
thus world wide poverty is continuing or is even growing.
Criminal strategy of bank secret is working also for any
criminal dictator and for Muslim Saudi families
discriminating any women totally and being responsible for
the support of Islamization in Europe and in "America".
But all this is concealed by Mr. Blocher.
Herr Blocher
erwähnt, dass viele ausländische Firmen sich in
der Schweiz niedergelassen haben:
<Im letzten Jahr haben sich rund 510
ausländische Unternehmen in der Schweiz
niedergelassen. Ausgerechnet im Nicht-EU-Land
Schweiz. Oder ist es gerade deswegen? Grosse
Firmen haben ihren europäischen Hauptsitz in die
Schweiz verlegt. Ist das Zufall? Die Summe der
Direktinvestitionen in der Schweiz (also die
Summe Geld, die ausländische Firmen in der
Schweiz investieren) hat einen Höchstwert
erreicht. Alles Zufall?>
|
|
|
Then Mr. Blocher
means that many foreign companies have come to
Switzerland founding their seat here:
<In the last year more than 510 foreign
companies have found their seat in Switzerland.
Just in the non EU country of Switzerland. Or
just because of this? Big companies shifted
their European head offices to Switzerland. Is
this just a coincidence? The total sum of direct
investment in Switzerland (all the money which
was invested by foreign companies in
Switzerland) reached a new peak. Is this just a
coincidence?>
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Blocher is concealing
-- which companies
-- where they came from
-- how the conditions are in other countries
-- and which companies have left Switzerland.
Thus the number of "510" remains mentioned without any
comparison and this seems to be a deliberate manipulation.
Herr Blocher lügt
dem Publikum auch vor, dass ein EWR-Vertrag wie
ein EU-Vertrag wäre! Der Alkohol-Stammtisch-Kopf
Blocher ist nicht fähig, diese Verträge zu
unterscheiden! Und diese Manipulation verdient
nun wirklich die Qualifikation, die Goethe auch
in gewissen Situationen gebrauchte: ein
"Arschloch":
<Ein EWR-Vertrag oder eine EU-Mitgliedschaft
würde die Grundlagen unserer erfolgreichen
Schweiz zerstören:
- Eurokratie statt direkte Demokratie mit
Volksinitiative und Referendum
- Fremdbestimmung statt wachsame
Selbstbestimmung
- Zentralismus statt föderalistische
Vielfalt
- Verlust der Direkten Demokratie
- Einschränkung statt Handlungsfreiheit
- höhere Arbeitslosigkeit
- Verlust der Währung und damit der
Inflation ausgeliefert.
- höhere Schuld- und Hypothekarzinsen
- entsprechend höhere Wohnungsmieten
- zusätzliche Steuern, Prämien und Abgaben
- Attraktivitätsverlust des schweizerischen
Wirtschaftsstandortes>
|
|
|
<Mr. Blocher
is going on with his lies that an EEA treaty
would be an EU treaty! Mr. Blocher seems to be
an alcoholic at the regulars' table when he
cannot see the difference between these two
contracts! And this manipulation is really
deserving the qualification that also Goethe was
using in certain situations: an "ass hole":
<An EEA treaty or a EU membership had
destroyed the base of our successful
Switzerland:
- there would be eurocracy instead of direct
democracy with people's votes and
referendums
- there would be heteronomy instead of
vigilant self determination
- direct democracy had lost
- liberty of action had been limited
- unemployment had been higher
- our currency had been lost and the country
would be at the mercy of inflation
- interests would be higher for debts and
properties
- rents for flats would be higher
correspondingly
- there would be additional taxes, premiums
and fees
- Switzerland would loose attraction for
economy.>
|
|
|
|
|
One can ask why this propaganda party of SVP is elected
yet. It seems that many Swiss have simply the same habit
to give their brain to the beer glass. All this should be
caused by EEA, or by an EU membership, in the same manner?
This cannot be. Add to this the introduction of EURO is
one more separate treaty affording one more separate
people's vote! And the most important point of EU Mr.
Blocher did not mention: mafia and robbery mentality of
the southern EU states soaking funds from Brussels.
Additionally also mafia from eastern Europe and from
Russia is working in the EU. The fact is that Blocher is
not mentioning this mafia which is constantly sucking
funds from Brussels, and the fact that Mr. Blocher is not
mentioning this provokes a certain suspicion that Mr.
Blocher could also be a certain mafia member - as other
government members and chief public prosecutors also are.
Und dann kommt
Herr Blocher zum Thema "Meinungsfreiheit":
<Die direkte Demokratie ist aber nie bloss
ein formelles Abstimmungsverfahren gewesen. Die
direkte Demokratie setzt Gedanken-, Rede- und
Meinungsfreiheit voraus. Ohne diese gibt es
keine Demokratie. Jeder Bürger muss frei seine
Meinung äussern können.
In undemokratischer Weise wird zunehmend von
denen, die etwas zu sagen haben, versucht,
Meinungen zu verbieten, zu unterdrücken oder
gar zu verfälschen, statt dass man andere
Meinungen zulässt und – wenn nötig –
widerlegt. Ich staune, wie in vielen Fragen
nur eine einzige Meinung zugelassen wird. Eine
Demokratie muss jedoch in Alternativen denken,
handeln und regieren, sonst macht sie keinen
Sinn!
Die Meinungsfreiheit darf darum nicht durch
Gesinnungsgesetze eingeschränkt werden.
Die Meinungsfreiheit darf nicht durch eine
Gesinnungsjustiz verfolgt werden.
Die Meinungsfreiheit darf nicht einer
vorherrschenden Gesinnungspolitik geopfert
werden.>
|
|
|
And then Mr.
Blocher is speaking about the topic of "freedom
of speech":
<Direct democracy has never only been just a
vote. Direct democracy has it's precondition
with freedom of thinking, of speech and of
meaning. Without these there is no democracy.
Any civilian has to have the right to utter it's
free meaning.
Other persons treat more and more in an
undemocratic way to forbid or to suppress or
even to falsify meanings instead of accepting
other meanings, and - when it's necessary - they
are refuted. I am only astonished how in many
affairs only one single meaning is permitted. A
democracy has to consider all alternatives and
has also to act and to govern with all
alternatives, otherwise this makes no sense!
Freedom of meaning must not be limited by laws
of sympathy.
Freedom of meaning must not be pursued by a
justice of sympathy.
Freedom of meaning must not be sacrificed by a
dominating policy of sympathy.>
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately this is not just so right because just SVP
is violating this freedom of meaning when there is a
constant manipulation of whole Switzerland in a Nazi
manner with advertisings and posters in a frightening way
manipulating the meanings enforcing the meaning with faked
and inefficient tactics against foreigners and often
criminalizing them.
All in all Mr. Blocher's propaganda in this speech was
only continued. Intellectually Mr. Blocher has made NO
progress since 1992, and this seems really very poor. And
Mr. Blocher was in these times Justice Minister of
Switzerland...
As long as
this Nazi party SVP is existing Switzerland should be
consequently excluded and boycotted because one cannot
live in peace in this Nazi state of Switzerland.
There
is no advertising with criminals.
